2000 Lancia Kappa vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Lancia Kappa is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,969 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Kappa (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 305 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Kappa (309 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lancia Kappa | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Kappa | 929 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1929 cc | 1969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |
