2000 Lancia Kappa vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Lancia Kappa is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,929 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Kappa (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 685 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Kappa (309 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lancia Kappa | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Lancia | Zastava |
| Model | Kappa | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1929 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2160 mm |
