2000 Lancia Zeta vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Lancia Zeta is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Zeta (145 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Zeta (235 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lancia Zeta | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Lancia | Simca |
Model | Zeta | Aronde |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2450 mm |