2000 Lancia Zeta vs. 1969 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2000 Lancia Zeta is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Zeta (145 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 670 kg more than 1969 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Zeta (235 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: