2000 Lancia Zeta vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Lancia Zeta is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Zeta (145 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 470 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Zeta (235 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lancia Zeta | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Zeta | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2640 mm |