2000 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Land Rover Freelander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Land Rover Freelander would be higher.
Because 2000 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Land Rover Freelander (166 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2000 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 2000 Land Rover Freelander has manual transmission. 2000 Land Rover Freelander will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Land Rover Freelander | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Land Rover | Smart |
| Model | Freelander | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1867 mm |
