2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover (187 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1350 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Land Rover Range Rover | 1965 Renault 8 | |
Make | Land Rover | Renault |
Model | Range Rover | 8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2280 mm |