2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1971 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover (187 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1971 Triumph Spitfire. (57 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1971 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1310 kg more than 1971 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover (321 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Triumph Spitfire. (97 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Land Rover Range Rover | 1971 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Land Rover | Triumph |
Model | Range Rover | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2000 | 1971 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 97 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2110 mm |