2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover (187 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. (156 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2011 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Land Rover | Peugeot |
Model | Range Rover | RCZ |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1359 mm |