2000 Lexus GS vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lexus GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lexus GS would be higher. At 4,293 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lexus GS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lexus GS (277 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lexus GS should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lexus GS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lexus GS (417 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2000 Lexus GS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. 2000 Lexus GS has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lexus GS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lexus GS | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Lexus | Citroen |
Model | GS | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 417 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |