2000 Lincoln Continental vs. 1996 Opel Corsa
To start off, 2000 Lincoln Continental is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Opel Corsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Opel Corsa would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lincoln Continental (372 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Opel Corsa. (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Opel Corsa. 2000 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 1996 Opel Corsa has manual transmission. 1996 Opel Corsa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lincoln Continental | 1996 Opel Corsa | |
Make | Lincoln | Opel |
Model | Continental | Corsa |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 372 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2450 mm |