2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1943 Simca 5
To start off, 2000 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Simca 5 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 829 more horse power than 1943 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1943 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1943 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotec C 1000 | 1943 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Lotec | Simca |
| Model | C 1000 | 5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1943 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1350 mm |
