2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2000 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotec C 1000 | 1991 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Lotec | Toyota |
| Model | C 1000 | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1452 cc |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1910 mm |
