2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 739 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.

Because 2000 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 760 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (230 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Lotec C 1000 2004 Mazda 3
Make Lotec Mazda
Model C 1000 3
Year Released 2000 2004
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 5500 cc 1595 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 843 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 990 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 1240 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1150 mm 1470 mm