2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2004 MG ZR

To start off, 2004 MG ZR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 741 more horse power than 2004 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZR weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.

Because 2000 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 867 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZR.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Lotec C 1000 2004 MG ZR
Make Lotec MG
Model C 1000 ZR
Year Released 2000 2004
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 5500 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 843 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 990 Nm 123 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 1095 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 4020 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1150 mm 1410 mm