2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2005 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 725 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Musso. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 786 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2005 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 734 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Musso. (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotec C 1000 | 2005 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Lotec | SsangYong |
Model | C 1000 | Musso |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 256 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1740 mm |