2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2010 BMW 128
To start off, 2010 BMW 128 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 613 more horse power than 2010 BMW 128. (230 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 128 weights approximately 505 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 719 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 128. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 128.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotec C 1000 | 2010 BMW 128 | |
Make | Lotec | BMW |
Model | C 1000 | 128 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1412 mm |