2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2011 Audi S3
To start off, 2011 Audi S3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 591 more horse power than 2011 Audi S3. (252 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi S3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi S3 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2011 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 659 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Audi S3. (331 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Audi S3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotec C 1000 | 2011 Audi S3 | |
| Make | Lotec | Audi |
| Model | C 1000 | S3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 331 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1455 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1770 mm |
