2000 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP) has 733 more horse power than 2011 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Cruze.
Because 2000 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 837 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotec C 1000 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Lotec | Holden |
| Model | C 1000 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1477 mm |
