2000 Lotus Exige vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Exige. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Exige would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Exige (177 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2000 Lotus Exige is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Exige. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Exige. (180 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Exige.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus Exige | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Lotus | Holden |
Model | Exige | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2700 mm |