2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1971 Rover 2000
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1971 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1971 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rover 2000 weights approximately 839 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover 2000. (172 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus Extreme | 1971 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | Extreme | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 700 cc | 1978 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2640 mm |
