2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1973 Triumph 1500
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 1500 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Triumph 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 1500. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph 1500 weights approximately 509 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 1500. (110 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus Extreme | 1973 Triumph 1500 | |
| Make | Lotus | Triumph |
| Model | Extreme | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 700 cc | 1493 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2460 mm |
