2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 1024 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2000 Lotus Extreme has manual transmission. 2000 Lotus Extreme will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus Extreme | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lotus | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Extreme | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 700 cc | 3790 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2760 mm |
