2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1981 Mini MK IV
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mini MK IV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1981 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1981 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mini MK IV weights approximately 154 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus Extreme | 1981 Mini MK IV | |
Make | Lotus | Mini |
Model | Extreme | MK IV |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 61 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2040 mm |