2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Ascona weights approximately 494 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (94 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus Extreme | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Lotus | Opel |
Model | Extreme | Ascona |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 1297 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 94 Nm |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2580 mm |