2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1983 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 244 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus Extreme | 1983 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Lotus | Volkswagen |
Model | Extreme | Polo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 1043 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 74 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2340 mm |