2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 834 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus Extreme | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Lotus | Volvo |
| Model | Extreme | 240 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 700 cc | 1986 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2660 mm |
