2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1989 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,272 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. (44 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 384 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volkswagen Polo. (76 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus Extreme | 1989 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Lotus | Volkswagen |
Model | Extreme | Polo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 1272 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 76 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2340 mm |