2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 1998 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1998 Volkswagen Polo. (59 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1998 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 564 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volkswagen Polo. (116 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus Extreme | 1998 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Lotus | Volkswagen |
Model | Extreme | Polo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 116 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2410 mm |