2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 1029 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus Extreme | 2005 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | Extreme | 75 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 700 cc | 1796 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2750 mm |
