2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 700 cc, 2000 Lotus Extreme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Tata Nano weights approximately 144 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus Extreme | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Lotus | Tata |
Model | Extreme | Nano |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 624 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 48 Nm |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2230 mm |