2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1947 Talbot T 26. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1947 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 925 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Lotus | Talbot |
| Model | M250 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 4481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3130 mm |
