2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1959 Peugeot 403
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Peugeot 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Peugeot 403 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1959 Peugeot 403. (56 HP @ 4650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1959 Peugeot 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Peugeot 403 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1959 Peugeot 403 | |
| Make | Lotus | Peugeot |
| Model | M250 | 403 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1466 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4650 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2670 mm |
