2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 291 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Lotus | Nissan |
| Model | M250 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2390 mm |
