2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotus M250 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Lotus | Lotus |
| Model | M250 | Elan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |
