2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1967 Steyr 700C
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1967 Steyr 700C. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1967 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotus M250 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1967 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Steyr 700C. (41 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1967 Steyr 700C | |
| Make | Lotus | Steyr |
| Model | M250 | 700C |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 642 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 1950 mm |
