2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1968 Mazda Luce
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Luce. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Luce weights approximately 475 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1968 Mazda Luce | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | M250 | Luce |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 57 L |
