2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1969 MG MGC
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1969 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1969 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 MG MGC. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1969 MG MGC | |
| Make | Lotus | MG |
| Model | M250 | MGC |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2560 mm |
