2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1972 Morgan 4
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1972 Morgan 4. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1972 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotus M250 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1972 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Morgan 4. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus M250 | 1972 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Lotus | Morgan |
Model | M250 | 4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2450 mm |