2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1973 ZIL 114
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2505 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 ZIL 114 (580 Nm) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1973 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus M250 | 1973 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Lotus | ZIL |
Model | M250 | 114 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 580 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 3180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3770 mm |