2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | M250 | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |
