2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 805 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Lotus | Mercury |
| Model | M250 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2650 mm |
