2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 205 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.

Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications: