2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1988 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1115 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 1988 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus M250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Toyota 4Runner (240 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1988 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus M250 | 1988 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | M250 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |