2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 180 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (88 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus M250 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | M250 | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 88 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1400 mm |