2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1995 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Seat Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Seat Toledo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Seat Toledo weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Seat Toledo (205 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1995 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus M250 | 1995 Seat Toledo | |
Make | Lotus | Seat |
Model | M250 | Toledo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 205 Nm |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1055 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |