2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotus M250 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Lotus | MCC |
| Model | M250 | Smart |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
