2000 Lotus M250 vs. 1999 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1999 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1999 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 990 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Opel Omega (203 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1999 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus M250 | 1999 Opel Omega | |
Make | Lotus | Opel |
Model | M250 | Omega |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 203 Nm |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 75 L |