2000 Lotus M250 vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 3,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 1081 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (372 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Lotus | Nissan |
| Model | M250 | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |
