2000 Lotus M250 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 945 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
| Model | M250 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 95 L |
